highlyeccentric: Mo Willems' Pigeon declaring its love for puppies (Puppy lovin' pigeon)
  • Miranda Johnson (Meanjin), Muting, unmuting and everything in between
  • JoAnn Wypijewski (LitHub), How capitalism created sexual dysfunction. This is both a very interesting article with some novel angles, and definitely not the whole story. It cites Rachel Maines' The Technology of Orgasm, and criticisms against her, but is frustratingly vague in WHAT exactly from Maines' work is challenged (quotes someone saying there's no support for her thesis... without giving a concise statement of what Maines' thesis is understood to be). It overstates the capitalism angle and blurs that with mass medicalisation, without enough nuance.
    And I often feel like there's an underlying thread of disdain in anti-capitalist and some feminist arguments on the origin of the vibrator that assumes there's something wrong with reliance thereupon to reach orgasm: that either a woman so reliant (lbr these articles never talk about non-women) is physically alienated from her own sexuality, or duped by capitalism / sexual normativity into thinking she needs orgasms at all. This article, like many such, conflates inability to reach orgasm *through intercourse* with anorgasmia in general, and certainly never considers the possibility of women who *can* climax by PIV but not by the methods generally touted as What Works For Women.
  • Robin Wall Kimmerer (LitHub), Greed does not have to define our relationship to land: on choosing to belong to a place. Kimmerer addresses "Dear Readers—America, Colonists, Allies, and Ancestors-yet-to-be", uses the figure of the Windigo to interpret contemporary politics, and calls upon the reader to "put aside the mindset of the colonizer and become native to place*.
  • En Tous Genres blog, La langue neutre en français. I have been looking for this guide for many years. As expected, it's a tangled mess, involving not just neopronouns but a constantly shifting array of choices for adjective formation and phrasing. I would not feel in the slightest bit comfortable making those choices for anyone else, and while I can mostly remember neopronouns, the mind boggles at trying to keep separate in one's mind what each individual person prefers for each adjective cluster. At one point the advice was simply to avoid words like 'heureux' entirely - use 'en bon humeur' instead. THAT one could do, and it would be great fun for literary purposes, but ... odd, surely, to live in? A circumscribed vocabulary that declared one could never be happy, only in good humour, on account of gender?
  • Glenn Albrecht (Conversation AU), The Age of Solastalgia. I've had Missy Higgins' album of that name for years, but never actually looked up the term. Apparently it was coined w/r/t the environmental grief of (presumably mostly white? just because academic studies tend to attract mostly white people) citizens living in the Upper Hunter under the combined stress of the Millennium Drought and the massive landscape changes of open cut mining. Homesick for a place that no longer exists.
  • Maggie Doherty (LitHub), The creative communities that changed literature forever. Looks at a circle of women in the 1950s associated with the Radcliffe Institute, who called themselves 'The Equivalents', in comparison with various other better known writerly communities.
  • Jedyah from Jersey (Blog), Why bodegas are essential to black and brown communities.
  • Sarah Holder (CityLab), After police reform, crime falls in Camden, New Jersey. This was passed around as an example of what can happen when you defund the police, but actually I think it did involve an injection of funds - but more importantly a reallocation of funds within the department. I'm increasingly leaning toward abolitionist arguments, but a common claim seems to be that police reform doesn't work, just injects money and papers things over. This article stresses that factors are intersecting (the massive drop in homicides might not be a drop in assaults - it might be a result of a new police policy requiring the police to personally transport injured victims if no ambulance is forthcoming within a certain time, meaning fewer people die), and there's no broad robust data on 'community policing' because, simply put, not enough jurisdictions have both *started* and *gone through with* said reforms.
  • Amy McQuire (Saturday Paper), There cannot be 432 victims and no perpetrator. On Indigenous deaths in custody in Australia. The number is higher than 432 now.
  • Mike Seccombe (Saturday Paper), The RoboDebt class action. Despite the govt's intention to refund Robodebt payments, the class action is going ahead.
  • Menye Wyatt (on ABC Q&A), Monologue from City of Gold on anti-Indigenous racism. Transcript included.
  • Rev. Dr. William J. Barber III (LitHub), The politics of rejecting the poor. I might not be a Christian any more, but damn, I know a good sermon when I see it.
  • Dennis Altman (Meanjin), AIDS to COVID: we have been here before.
  • Neuroclastic (blog), The intersection of gender, misogyny and autism.
  • Lucas Iberico Lozada, interview with Karla Cornejo Villavicencio (Guernica), DREAMer memoirs have their purpose, but that was not what I set out to write.
  • Myriam Gurba (Electric Lit), It's time to take California back from Joan Didion.
  • Daniel Lavery (ShatnerChatner), Is flesh a problem or an opportunity in the eyes of God?. Still not sure I'm fully on board with Danny's new more esoteric writing style, but this is worth a read.
  • Hannah Ross (LitHub), A brief feminist history of bike riding.
  • Nasrin Mahtoutchi (Overland), The trace of the place: on origins, imprisonment, refugee status, immigration, and Sydney.
  • highlyeccentric: Red Dwarf - angry Rimmer (rimmer on the attack)
    Behold, some links.

  • [personal profile] anneapocalypse (Nov 2019), The Internet has changed, and what that means. Fandom-focused but not, I think, exclusive to fandom in the dynamics it describes. Although as usual I think it slightly underestimates the capacity of Web 2.0 fandom spaces to generate toxic conflicts.
  • Elly Belle (Healthline), Codependency: how emotional neglect turns us into people-pleasers. I am trying to recall why I saved this article, other than that it's a good article, and perhaps it's because it's such a nice, balanced contrast to that piece that went around some years ago, for men who desperately need autonomy that argued the only route to secure attachment is, essentially, absolute over-investment. (I did not like that piece, and here is a blogger with similar dislike).
  • Jaclyn Adomeit (Electric Lit), Small Quarantine Joys and Setbacks, comic.
  • Poly.Land blog, The difference between no, but and yes, and. This is not about improv theatre, it's about pedantic communication.
  • CN Lester (The Photographer's Gallery), Being seen: on ways for talking about gender-nonconformity in archival material.
  • Aaron Robertson (LitHub), On Black pessimism and George Floyd. Links Toni Cade Barbera's novel about the Atlanta Murders of 1979-81 with current affairs.
  • Poly.Land blog, What is an askhole and how can you avoid being one?. An askhole seeks advice and then does the opposite. Paige thinks through some possible options for why people do that (*I* do that! Sometimes because the point of the advice asking was that when faced with a laid out plan I might realise it's Wrong; sometimes I deliberately ask people, eg, my mother, who I will probably disagree with because I benefit from knowing in what way I disagree with them now).
  • Clare Courbald (The Conversation Aus), The fury in US cities is rooted in a long history of racist policing violence and inequality. Headline is hardly new news, nor is the fact that focusing attention on condemning looting detracts from valid grievances. Courbald walks through a lot of demographic information and gives some key perspectives on riots and looting - most of which I had heard of before but not all in the one place.
  • Rebecca Spang (LitHub), Why did so many restaurants stay open during the 1918 pandemic? Part of a much larger study on the history of restaurants, which I must read.
  • Trey Harris (200?, ibiblio.org), The case of the 500 mile email. An internet classic, worth revisiting.
  • Adolfo Aranjuez (Archer), Against gay conversion therapy: loving the "sinner". No new news, but I love Aranjuez' writing.
  • Francis Wade, interview with Judith Butler (The Nation), The Violence of Neglect. Has Judith Butler discovered clarity of expression? This is very good, both complex and clear.
  • AE Osworth, interview with Meredith Talusan (Guernica), I'm not brave. Some really interesting comments on tense and time in memoir, and Talusan's choice to refer to herself in the past using masculine markers and nouns.
  • Fatima Measham (Meanjin), No country for pretty horses: on the necessity of brumby culls.
  • Hannah Reich (ABC Arts), Stolen Generations survivor Sandra Hill turned to art to tell her story. The artworks depicted are *phenomenal* in their use of colour and domestic interiority.
  • No byline, SMH (2003), Snowy Baker's low blow meant the end for Darcy. High intrigue surrounding the famous boxer and draft-dodger Les Darcy.
  • Houlbrook and Waters (History Workshop Journal, 62.1 (2006) 142-162), Heart in Exile: Detatchment and Desire in 1950s London. I plan to read the novel this analyses - I only skimmed it but even from the abstract it seems to be doing a very good job of historicising and de-essentialising the category of 'gay' wrt to which The Heart In Exile is 'a gay novel'.
  • Yomi Adegoke (British Vogue), We need to rethink our pics-or-it-didn't-happen approach to activism.
  • highlyeccentric: Sign on Little Queen St - One Way both directions (Default)
    I forgot to do any links on Thursday and now I’m traveling for ten days. This post is assembled on my phone so may be a bit weird, formatting wise.

    Current Slightly Outdated Affairs and once-hot takes
    * alQaws on Twitter:

    Item 3 is ‘steer clear of pinkwashing’.
    * Alice Drury, SMH: Whistleblower protections hang in the balance. “Espionage offences introduced last year impose a sentence of up to 20 years for publishing an opinion if it could negatively impact Australia's political or economic relationship with another country. The impact need not be serious or substantial, it just needs to do more than merely embarrass our government: for instance, by undermining the relationship between an Australian and foreign official.” Drury is focused on whistleblowers, but the espionage laws apply to *anyone* who doesn’t have parliamentary privilege, and affect published data as well as opinion. The risks for academics are huge.
    *Luke Henriques-Gomez (Guardian AU): Welfare changes forced woman into volunteer work as husband was dying. Once someone goes into palliative care you’re no longer their carer and subject to work (or for over-60s, volunteer work) requirements.
    *Nassim Khadem (ABC): Paying more than 10000 cash could make you a criminal.

    Good News:
    *ABC Eyre Shire: Beach wheelchairs finally roll out in Whyalla.

    Longer, assorted, pieces
    *Alison Flood (Guardian UK): >Rolled Over: why did married couples stop sleeping in twin beds? Or, rather, why was there a few-decade fashion for twin beds in the late 19th and early 20th century?
    *Rax King (Electric Lit): What teen romance novels failed to teach me about sex.
    *Sean Kelly (SMH): ”Harmless” political rhetoric is really destructive. On Alan Jones, Scott Morrison, transphobia and misogyny.
    *Andrew Whitehead (History Workshop): How Indian is Kashmir
    *Chingy L (The Bottom’s Line): I’m a much better bottom than you, here’s why. The performative persona around this is obnoxious as hell but the advice seems sound.
    *Vicky Xiuzhong Xu (SMH): Chinese nationalists are trolling me, but I was once one of them. Xu has gone from launching a complaint against a tutor who reacted dismissively to a presentation arguing against Human Rights, to now working as a Human Rights journalist. (It’s not really germane to the article but, while she’s urging empathy for Chinese nationalist students in Australia, I’m wondering what happened to that tutor. With complaints cases like this, it’s not the student, nor the university, who has most to lose: it’s precariously employed academics.)
    *Various (The Conversation): What should the parliamentary book club read? Our experts take their pick. Pretty weak if actually intended for parliament but an interesting selection of Auslit.

    All of these are slightly old now, and I have Many More in my pinboard stack. Sorry folks, I have been legit busy and also having a Mental Elf.

    Sent from my iPhone
    highlyeccentric: Book on a shelf, entitled "Oh God: What the Fuck (and other stories)" (Oh god what the fuck (and other tails))
    So this experiment in posting links to my online reading has become... kind of overwhelming. it went rapidly from 'one or two things of note' to 'me keeping a record of anything worthwhile I read', which is... well. You can fill in for yourselves why the latter might be attractive to me, in this the Year of Career Furlough, Academic Blergh, And Personal ???. I don't regret it but I doubt I'll keep it up past 2019.

    What this does mean I can do, though, is look back (because I started making separate link posts in January) and pull out 2-3 pieces from each month. Pieces I keep coming back to, for whatever reason.

    January:
  • Pankaj Mishra (NYT), The Malign Incompetence of the British Ruling Class: "With Brexit, the chumocrats who drew borders from India to Ireland are getting a taste of their own medicine." Barely three days have gone by since this went up that I have not thought about How Right It Is.
  • Kathryn Schultz (New Yorker), The earthquake that will devastate the Pacific Northwest. Perhaps because for the first time I'm living in an earthquake zone, I think about this a lot.


  • February:
  • Louise Milligan (Guardian AU, book extract), The Kid and the Choirboy. I read a lot of very good, very harrowing Pell coverage, but this is the one that sticks with me. The interviews with the dead young man's mother, who had no idea, no way to explain what had sent her son so far off the rails, are particularly... something. It was this piece that really drove it home to me that these boys are only a few years older than me.
  • Price, Hedenstierna-Johnson, Zachrisson, et al, Viking warrior women? Reassessing Birka chamber grave Bj.581. Finally a good, open-access, nuanced and yet readable-to-non-archaeologists piece on sexing viking graves (hint: genotype, phenotype, and grave goods are ALL problematic).


  • March:
  • Kelly J Baker (Women in Higher Ed), The Productivity Trap. Honestly I probably don't come back to this as often as I ought. Arguably, this entire exercise in link-saving is a Productivity Trap in itself.
  • Joshua Badge (Meanjin Blog), Difference and the Politics of Fear: a response to Christchurch, but also, an incredibly accurate description of Australian culture/politics, going right back as far as I can *remember* being aware of politics. It's... somehow reassuring to see your own memories pinned down like that. I'm not making this up: there is a clear line of continuity between then and now.
  • Jasmine Andersson (iNews UK), LGBT teachers who taught under s28 are still 'scarred' by its legacy. I've read a lot about education and LGBT people in the UK and AUs, this year, but this one... haunts me.


  • April:
  • Neli at Delicious Meets Healthy, How to make perfect hard boiled eggs. You laugh, but until this April I have never been competent at making hard boiled eggs, and now I am, and I have consumed them daily since mid-April. Therefore, this is the most memorable article I read in April.
  • Yen-Rong Wong (Meanjin Summer 2018), The Very Model of an Model Ethnic Minority. I would like to make this essay compulsory reading for Clueless White People.
  • Mike Seccombe (The Saturday Paper), Election 2019: Welcome to the Age War. Sums up the memorable economics issues of Election 2019.


  • May:
  • Sally Young (The Conversation) The Secret History of NewsCorp. I'm still fuming and shaking my fist over this. Of course NewsCorp started out as a union-busting pro-mining newspaper-buyer-upper-er company. OF COURSE.
  • Ruth Padawer (NYT, 2016), The humiliating practice of sex-testing female athletes: provided essential historical and scientific background to the Semenya case.
  • Arwa Marhadawi (Guardian UK), Palestinian lives don't matter.


  • June:
  • Tiernan, Deem and Menzies (The Conversation), Queensland to Quexiteers: don't judge try to understand us. Notable for being one of the few 'you just don't understand Queensland' pieces I read that actually explains the regional economy, instead of bleating vaguely about jobs.
  • Alexis Wright (Meanjin Summer 2018), The Power and Purpose of Literature. If this doesn't end up on literary theory course readers it's a crying shame. (Also a shame if it *only* ends up on indigenous lit / postcolonial course readers)
  • Richard Cooke (Saturday Paper), Free Speech, Censorship, and Media Raids. Viciously skewers the commonly-held notion that Australia has *ever* had a free media landscape.


  • So, there we go. The 16 most memorable things I read on the internet in the first half of 2019. And yes, I really do need to rein back the compulsive Reading Of Everything, June in particular was a mess to sift through.
    highlyeccentric: Ariadne drawing mazes (Inception - Ariadne drawing)
    Supplement to monday links, occurs irregularly.

    Short essays, current affairs, hot takes:
    • Alexandra Erin on twitter, thread on the 'Shirley Exception'.


      Problem is, it never becomes clear whether Erin is addressing 'how can they' in the sense of 'by what means can they' or the sense of 'how dare they'.
    • HRLC launches an abortion decriminalisation campaign for NSW. (I... had no idea it was still criminalised.)



    Auspol post-election special
    • This one from before the election: Danny Tran Michael Workman and Lachlan Moffat Gray (ABC), 'Death taxes' scare campaign continues but Labor says its fake news.
    • I think I linked to this one last week but it's a follow-up to the above: Knaus and Karp, 87 cases of election ads breaching the law.
    • Dana McCauley (SMH), Employers demand crackdown on unions and casuals double-dipping. TL,DR, what happened here is a court ruled that a man employed on a casual basis (zero hours, at-will; gets paid more per hour than a part-timer or full-timer because not entitled to holidays or sick leave) but on a regular schedule for x amount of time is entitled to have holiday pay after all. Obviously the employers want legislation changed so it's clear he's not. I'd like legislation changed so you can't *do* that, employ someone as a casual on a regular basis for so long, but... I actually do think that, assuming you *are* employed as a casual, on casual rates, then it is reasonable that you not be given holiday pay.
    • Elizabeth Humphrys (Overland), We live in anti-political times.
      Anti-politics is not a left or right phenomenon, but a hatred of the previously dominant political parties and a process whereby parties and projects attempt to capitalise on that. It is not a phenomenon that is only outside the established political parties, but one that also occurs within them.
      On the right internationally, politicians like Trump and events like the Brexit vote are expressions of anti-political sentiment and attempts to capture that for political ends. On the left, we can see it present in the 15M movement in Spain (and their slogan ‘they do not represent us’) and, before that, the explosion of popularity for Comedian Russell Brand and his (rhetorical) calls for revolution. There are also parties like Italy’s Five Star Movement, that are harder to categorise in a left-right schema. Populist parties, that appeal to the idea of ‘ordinary citizens’ rather than more established ideologies, are also becoming more prevalent.
      In Australia, both One Nation and Clive Palmer tap into the anti-political sentiment, as do the Greens (although their ability to do this was weakened by its relationship to the Gillard Government). It is also useful to think of Kevin Rudd’s significant popularity in light of anti-political sentiment, given he positioned himself as outside the normal power structures of the Labor Party and ‘play[ed] to public bitterness at the self-interested Canberra elite’.

    • Annabel Crabbe (ABC), Plibersek won't contest the Labor leadership, so what went wrong. Makes the fair point that if MPs spent more time in their electorates, it wouldn't be so hard for women/parents to take on leadership roles in parliament.
    • Sydney Criminal Lawyers, Morrison's victory and what the nation has agreed to. Of particular concern: everything, but the one that was news to me is the Identity-Matching Services Bill 2018, a pet project of Dutton's that I had forgotten about.


    Longreads - essay, memoir, natural history, other
    • Steve Salaita (blog), James Baldwin and the Jewish State. Among points that are unsurprising to anyone who's met evangelical Christians:
      For Baldwin, Zionism isn’t an atavistic cultural or religious attribute, but the modern articulation of an age-old colonial logic.  “In order to be a Zionist,” he notes, “it is not necessary to love the Jews.  I know some Zionists who are definitely anti-Semitic.” This point impugns some of Zionism’s basic premises:  that Israel embodies Jewishness; that Israel is a necessary response to anti-Semitism; that Israel offers a utopian model of nationhood. Among other uses, the ideology shows how likely, even necessary, it is in imperialist cosmologies to uncouple humans who occupy a territory from the economic utility of nation-states that exist in their name.

      This is not an easy read (look at that last sentence, that's... a lot packed into one sentence), but a worthwhile one, imho. It's a bit slippery, though, because it's not Salaita writing an essay on Israel (he has done that before), it is him offering a reading of Baldwin on Israel. He could be wrong in his understanding of Baldwin (although he addresses several other common interpretations); certainly Baldwin could be disputed one some points.
    • Isabel Debre and Raphael Satter (AP news), Facebook busts Israel-based campaign to disrupt elections. This one from the department of misleading headlines: it should read 'Israeli company selling election-disrupting services'. Current headline can easily be misconstrued as implying an *Israeli* campaign, or indeed a single campaign, when it's actually a company selling misinformation-campaign services to many bidders. Has largely flown under the radar because the elections in question have mostly been in sub-Saharan Africa, South America and SE Asia.
    • NBC news, Russian documents reveal desire to sow racial discord in the US. Unclear whether the plan was ever acted on; possibly Russia concluded the US generates its own racial discord.
    • Amanda Glindemann (Archer Magazine), girlfriends, gal pals, partners. Claims use of 'partner' to refer to a non-spousal but romantic/sexual wossname was a response to the AIDS crisis, which... seems plausible, but also contradicts what I am fairly sure was true everywhere except maybe the US, that the term came into by straight women in cohabitating partnerships with men they weren't married to, and divorced people who felt boy/girlfriend was infantalising in the 1980s. I'm *sure* it went hand-in-hand with 'Ms', and wasn't exclusively queer. But I wasn't alive in the 80s; perhaps the explanations I received in the 90s and early 2000s were wrong. Generally I find Americans asserting it's an exclusively queer term, and other Anglophones confident it has never been, so this article is... interesting, as it's the first Australian I've seen asserting the queer origin narrative. She has US sources, though.
    • Mats Wiklund (The Independent), Murky truth of how a neutral Sweden covered up its collaboration with Nazis.
    • Anna Carlisle (Inclusive Education blog), My four-year-old goes to school this September. Will he be bullied for having two mums?. UK-based, makes links with the lgbt-inclusion vs freedom-of-religion stoush going down in Birmingham.
    • Courtney Hagle and Grace Bennet (MediaMatters), A Fox host lobbied trump to pardon accused and convicted war criminals.. Did that happen, anyone know? I think it was supposed to happen on Memorial Day.
    • Melissa Davey (Guardian), One in seven young Australians say rape is okay if women change their minds, and other depressing news.


    Useful links (for varying definitions of 'useful')


    Comments policy: As per this post. I am a teacher, but not *your* teacher; thus I am not obliged to abide by the fallacy that there is no bad contribution to discussion.
    highlyeccentric: Green Eggs and Ham retitled: Fear of the Unknown Hinders Development of Informed Opinions (Fear of the unknown (green eggs and ham))
    Supplement to monday links, occurs irregularly.

    Short essays, current affairs, hot takes:
    • Secondbestkitchen (blog), Listless: My body feels very, very tired, but my brain feels as if I’ve done basically nothing for months now. That’s a hard combo for me: the sluggishness combined with the guilt over not doing much. Most days I do a little and spend a lot of time feeling bad about not doing more. This is, I think, a common plight for academics.
    • Jennifer Ouellette (Ars Technica), No, someone hasn't cracked the code of the mysterious Voynich manuscript. (See also J.K. Petersen, Cheshire reprised, for a thorough takedown of Cheshire's terrible palaeography skills and indeed non-existent linguistic expertise; and a live-tweet of the Cheshire article by Ben Cartlidge.)


    Subset: Auspol Election Special
    • David Crowe (SMH) on the Bill Shorten's Mum media moment: why this was the most compelling moment of this election campaign. Bonus points because, as it turns out, it... wasn't. As probably anyone could have told you if they thought about it at the time, the people feeling unaccustomed sympathy for Shorten and his mum were primarily people on the left, people normally *fed up* with Labor; not people who needed persuading that Labor are preferable to the liberals.
    • Helen Razer (own Patreon post), The Yard Glass is half empty: in which Razer takes, well, a razor to the memory of the (very recently late) Bob Hawke. TL;DR, Labor's great leader massively reduced union protections for workers. (This counts as election special because Hawkey saw fit to die right before the election, in a last doomed effort to get Labor over the line)
    • ABC news, A dozen Aboriginal communities. Thousands of kilometers. 400 votes: a look at the Electoral Commission workers who, by light aircraft, take a pre-poll voting booth around remote WA the week before elections.


    Good news:


    Longreads - essay, memoir, natural history, other
    • Arwa Marhadawi (Guardian UK), Palestinian lives don't matter:

      It is hard to imagine what it is like to be told that there is no right way you can protest against this treatment. Violent resistance is obviously out of the question. But so, apparently, are non-violent forms of resistance, such as the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement, which the US is trying to make illegal. The only acceptable thing you can do as a Palestinian, it would seem, is just shut up and die. And, for God’s sake, do not protest against Eurovision!


    • Jane Rawson (Overland), Just award the Vogels already.
      Not awarding the Vogel’s this year is downright cruel. Mediocre books get published all the time, and some of them even win multiple awards: who cares if you give the Vogel’s to a manuscript that isn’t a work of utter genius? The people who’ve submitted manuscripts have found a way to carve out time and space to write. They’ve dedicated themselves to a craft that has almost no financial or social reward. They’ve put their hopes on the line. Choose the best of the bunch and shortlist them: give one of them a prize. Maybe it will be the only money and recognition that writer ever gets, or maybe it will be the encouragement they need to go on to write better books. Either way, who cares: anything is better than the big plate of nothing most writers are served. And while you’re at it, prize-giving-organisations, how about setting up a prize for emerging writers over forty? How about one for an emerging writer whose career has been delayed by raising children, caring for parents, making a living, getting an education, being sick.

      I particularly liked the addition I saw to this on Twitter (by whom I cannot recall) to the effect of 'if you don't think mediocre books win awards, I regret to inform you you are probably the author of a mediocre book'.
    • Alexandra Dane (The Lifted Brow), A Gloomy Shade of Death: The Australian/Vogels Literary Award. Adds to the above an interesting history of Australian literary awards and their tendency to, I quote, 'flex' by refusing to shortlist.
    • Jacinta Koolmatrie (Guardian Indigenous X), The Western world is just catching up to what we know.

      Warratyi is located in Adnyamathanha country, my country. As an archaeology student at the time, these dates were amazing to hear. If you were to tell anyone from my community that their history extends back 49,000 years, they probably would not be that amazed. Because it would not be news to them.

      It is what we have been trying to tell scientists for years.


    • Colin H. Kahl and John B Wolfstahl, It's John Bolton's world and Trump is just living in it:
      In February, it was Bolton who reportedly pressed Trump to take an uncompromising line on denuclearization with North Korea’s Kim Jung Un, leading to a fruitless summit and an escalation of tensions. More recently, Bolton has taunted the Iranian regime, including issuing a dire warning last week of impending U.S. military action. And, closer to home, he has become the point person for the administration’s efforts to oust Nicolás Maduro’s government in Venezuela.
      While these may seem like disconnected responses to pressing global events, they are not. Rather, they reflect Bolton’s longstanding grudges against North Korea, Iran and Cuba (Maduro’s patron), and his deeply held beliefs regarding the futility of diplomacy, the benefits of regime change, and the wisdom of military action.
      Bolton — an unrepentant champion of the disastrous Iraq war — has never met a rogue state he didn’t want to isolate, topple and attack — and North Korea has long been at the top of his hit list.

    • Sally Young, The Secret History of NewsCorp. In case you thought the Murdoch press came innocently by its anti-unionist pro-coal agenda... turns out the parent company (predating the Murdoch family ending up in charge) was a shell company founded to buy up local papers and pump out anti-union 'news' in Broken Hill and Port Pirie.
    • John Pilger, own blog, The forgotten coup: how America and Britain crushed the government of their 'ally'. Advances the theory that the CIA and British authorities collaborated nefariously in the sacking of Whitlam. The British authorities part I've heard before (Buckhingham palace still won't release their half of the correspondance between Kerr and HMQ), but the CIA is a new one. I am... skeptical of Pilger's biases here, but I think we can probably rely on his assertion that the CIA referred to Kerr as 'our man Kerr'. Likewise, I would hope, the claim that Whitlam was going to table a motion in parliament re Pine Gap at about the time he was removed- that should be easily verifiable by fellow journalists, and he *is* a very respected journalist. So. Hmm. I would like to know more and I would like it to be provided with proper citations and editorial oversight, not a personal blog.


    Notable DW Content:


    Comments policy: As per this post.
    highlyeccentric: Me (portrait by Scarlet Bennet) (Not impressed)
    Supplement to monday links, occurs irregularly.

    Short essays, current affairs, hot takes:


    Subset: On Cathedrals and Cultural Heritage
    In case you live under a rock, Notre Dame cathedral caught fire on Monday evening and burned throughout the night.
    • Here is one of many twitter videos of the crowd on the banks of the Seine singing Ave Maria as the cathedral burns. I still can't watch without crying.


    • You may have heard by now that the main structure survived (the roof beams burned, and took with them the lead roof, and the 19th c grotesques, but the stone nave vaulting survived). Here is Matt Gabrielle on medieval architecture and fire. TL,DR that's no accident, a significant motivation for rib vaulting is it survives fire better than barrel vaulting. (NB Gabrielle is now tweeting this with the caveat that his statements on rebuilding need to be qualified with a call to reckon with the structure's history, including the nasty parts.)
    • Damian Fleming has a good thread about the craft of roofing, and how we should feel for the unfortunate restoration worker(s) who accidentally lit a spark in the attic:


    • Luke Gabrielle (ThinkProgress), Decoding the far right's language about Notre Dame and 'Western Civilisation'


    • I had a lot of feels all over twitter about the destructions we DON'T mourn, but here, here's a fabulously timed piece from the previous Friday:

    • Nayuka Gorrie (Guardian AU), The government wants to bulldoze my inheritance: 800-year old sacred trees. Same age, give or take, as Notre Dame. One's a globally mourned accident; the other collatoral damage to a road expansion.
    • Related to which: Protest camp site, including donation page. I don't like using gofundme, but... money where my mouth is, and all that. Sent through what I think of as my Hot Take Fee today, and intend to make a more substantive contribution next payday.


    • Also I heard from Facebook that the last Yangtze Softshell Turtle died on the same day as Notre Dame burned.


    Longreads - essay, memoir, natural history, other
    • Lane Sainty (Buzzfeed Aus), How The Geoffrey Rush #MeToo Defamation Case Went Disastrously Wrong For His Accuser. Starting with the fact that she had to discuss it in court in the first place, which she never wanted.
    • Kevin Sieff and Carolyn Van Houten (Washington Post), Her ancestors fled to Mexico to escape slavery 170 years ago. She still sings in English to this day.. Photo-essay focusing on the matriarch of the Mascogos tribe, descendents of African slaves who fled America. The tribe now speak Spanish, and seek work across the border in the US, but matriach Lucia Vazquez Valdez retains a trove of hymns in English, passed down through generations. There's audio. It's gorgeous.
    • S. Bear Bergman (Ask Bear), How do I know when to stop trying to fix myself and everything else.
      Some people are just do-it-make-it-fix-it oriented, and others have other skills and talents. That’s okay. The world needs its capable stewards as much as its disruptors. Some people are making glorious impassioned quotable speeches on the steps of a venerable monument and some people are bookkeeping for the revolution. All of these people are valuable to the work of justice and liberation. Let’s make sure we are valuing people for what they’re good at and their choices to lend some of that time and talent, whatever it looks like, toward the goal of a better world instead of always valorizing the person doing the face work. The one who spends their Sunday coding and categorizing a list of doors to knock on for the local municipal election doesn’t get much recognition, but without them the entire enterprise crumbles. Let’s be sure we have a clear sense who the entire iceberg, is what I’m saying. For everyone who is at the protest or action with a cheeky sign there’s someone who spent the entire previous day meticulously serving as an expert witness about sexual harassment taking a needed break with whiskey and comic books.

      I'm a little confused about how Bergman drew the conclusion the LW was primarily concerned about social justice inaction - that's really not the implication I drew from LW's frustration with people who were inactively happy with where they are and what they're doing. But hey, it's good advice anyway.
    • Joshua Mostafa (Overland), Mistaking symptoms for causes: the link between moralism and anti-semitism.

      A sensible place to begin thinking about the problem is to consider the nature of contemporary antisemitism and the ways it differs from other types of racism and xenophobia, as well as from older forms of antisemitism – and therefore might not be adequately addressed by generic condemnations of ‘all forms of racism’.

      Racist ideologies provided an intellectual cover for the depredations of European colonialism and the slave trade; as such, they presented the racialised Other as inferior, subhuman, irrational, irresponsible, incorrigibly violent and therefore in need of subjugation and oppression. Antisemitism, on the other hand imagines ‘the Jews’ not as inferior but as a global cabal of master manipulators )


      I have two qualms here: one, not particularly serious, but it baffles me that an Australian publication would run an article opening with an analysis of 'The Labour Party' without insisting on a specification of which labour party where. Yes, someone paying close attention can tell that the U means it's not the Australian Labor Party, but there are other countries than the UK with Labour-with-a-U parties! NZ, for one!
      Second qualm: I saw some Australian-twitter mutterings this week about it being a mistake to theorise contemporary anti-semitism separate from islamophobia, and I wonder if they were subtweeting this article. Even if not, I would be interested in seeing this article dissected by someone who holds that opinion.
    • Peter Greste (SMH, speaking as director of the Alliance for Journalists' Freedom), Julian Assange is no journalist; don't confuse his arrest with press freedom.

      Instead of sorting through the hundreds of thousands of files to seek out the most important or relevant and protect the innocent, he dumped them all onto his website, free for anybody to go through, regardless of their contents or the impact they might have had. Some exposed the names of Afghans who had been giving information on the Taliban to US forces.

      Journalism demands more than simply acquiring confidential information and releasing it unfiltered onto the internet for punters to sort through. It comes with responsibility.

      To effectively fulfil the role of journalism in a democracy, there is an obligation to seek out what is genuinely in the public interest and a responsibility to remove anything that may compromise the privacy of individuals not directly involved in a story or that might put them at risk.



    Useful links (for varying definitions of 'useful')
    • Neli at Delicious Meets Healthy, How to make perfect hard boiled eggs. Hard boiled eggs, like mashed potato, are one of those things I know how to do in theory, but there are so many variations I have never memorised a good one, and often end up picking a Terrible One. The hard boiled egg recipe in The Commonsense Cookery Book is particularly bad. But this one is not bad! I have bookmarked it and now I have eggs for workdays!
    • The Thesaurus Linguae Latinae is now available open-access. Let the angelic chorus rejoice.


    Comments policy: As per this post. With the added note that, if you have a lot of Feels in the vein of 'stop policing grief! value all sacred sites equally', take them somewhere bloody else until you've learned how cultural hegemony works. I spent yesterday talking down a white guy on Twitter from the claim that 'people' (read: non-white commentators, and those white twittizens who like myself had *complicated feelings*) were 'creating enmity' or... some fucking thing. I have no spare energy to rehearse that, there's plenty of actual opinion pieces out there today (and if you can't find one, refer to the ones from #weareallparis in 2015, it's the same basic principle except with heritage instead of terrorism).
    highlyeccentric: Green Eggs and Ham retitled: Fear of the Unknown Hinders Development of Informed Opinions (Fear of the unknown (green eggs and ham))
    Expect continuing irregularity as I up and move to Japan!

    Good News: (For a while I tried to run a whole tumblr dedicated to posting only good news. It didn't last, due to a general dearth of good news, but... it might be worth trying a recurring segment here)


    Current Affairs and Hot Takes:


    Longreads, various
    • Dennis Norris II (Electric Lit), T Kira Madden's Memoir is a love letter to misfits. Conversation with the author of 'Long live the tribe of fatherless girls' - some interesting perspectives on talking about damaging family experiences when you have chosen not to bundle the whole thing, or even any single individual, as 'all bad'.
    • Hannah McGregor (Electric Lit), Liking Books is Not A Personality.
      There is nothing new in this link between loving books and conspicuously consuming them. There is a long, classed history of book consumption as social posturing. As American culture scholar Lisa Nakamura points out, displaying books for others to view has long been “a form of public consumption that produces and publicizes a reading self.” But contemporary bookish culture extends conspicuous consumption beyond books themselves, to a range of lifestyle goods that have, in fact, played a significant role in the recent revival of independent bookstores (and in the expansion of Canadian book retailer Indigo into the U.S.). It is also more complex than a simple display of cultural or institutional capital, rooted as this culture is in a deep emotional investment in books that consumers have been taught to express through consumption. And we can see it playing out through the history of book-buying, from early bibliophilia to the midcentury Book-of-the-Month Club’s offer to help you build a personal library to millennial-aimed blogs that turn bookishness into consumer behavior.

    • Amal Awad (Meanjin blog), The Ongoing Threat of Minorities.

      In my research on Arab women, one woman who worked with Muslim women told me something I never forgot: racism is exclusively about power. There are layers. Stories. The human race is multi-dimensional, capable of feeling deeply in one extreme way or another, of experiencing contrast—hate or indifference, fear or love. We are less interested in a way of introspection, or compassion, in allowing for individualism that breeds a more united whole. You get flack for suggesting individualism is worthwhile, because we are tribal and interested in the power that comes with it.


    • Malachy Tallach (Boundless), The heart of beyond. Reflections on the fiction of remote places and the politics involved in writing somewhere as 'remote'.

      Philip Larkin was once asked in an interview why he chose to live in Hull, ‘so far away from the centre’. The poet responded with a rather more sensible enquiry: ‘The centre of what?’ As Larkin understood, the question of where is central and where remote is not so much a geographical one as it is political: a matter of perspective backed by power. ‘The centre’ is where decisions are made. It is where people and money are concentrated. ‘The centre’ is the voice to which everywhere else must listen.

      But Larkin’s question also has artistic implications. Because to write well about a place, to see and to show it as it truly is, it is necessary to rid oneself of the illusion of ‘remoteness’. Cliches must be cast aside, distance dissolved. The peripheral must become central.


    • Sandra Newman (Electric Lit), What if you can't afford 'A Room of One's Own'.
    • Osmond Chiu (Meanjin blog), Eliminating Racism, or, as we call it, Harmony:

      Thursday March 21 is the International Day for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination. You may not have heard of the day before. It is commemorated in Australia as Harmony Day.

      Harmony Day was a creation of the Howard Government twenty years ago, a response to research conducted for the federal government about the causes of racism. It was a deliberate choice to not focus on ‘anti-racism’ but rather emphasise the importance and value of ‘harmony’.


    • Charlotta Forss (Notches Blog), Some Like It Hot: Sex and the Sauna in Early Modern Sweden.

      Indeed, in report after report, early modern travellers to Sweden wrote home about the undress they had witnessed in the saunas. For instance, the Italian naturalist and diplomat Lorenzo Magalotti included a scene from a sauna when illustrating his narrative of his visit to Stockholm in 1674. In Magalotti’s sketch, a fully unclothed man rests on a bench at the back of the sauna while in the foreground, two female attendants wearing linen garments tend to the bathers.

      With accounts and illustrations like Magalotti’s, early modern travellers to Sweden voiced both fascination and a moral distancing from the local custom. In this way, the sauna provided travellers to Sweden with the curious and strange that was expected in an early modern travel narrative about foreign lands. At the same time, the sauna created an actual and conceptual space where the traveller could both join in with and comment on the local variability of eroticism.


    • Sandy Allen (them.us), Marie Kondo helped me sort out my gender
      I eventually ran out of the one makeup item I still sometimes wore, red lipstick, and now found myself incapable of making the trip to Sephora to buy more. A month later, kneeling and sobbing before my Marie Kondo discard pile, it felt silly ... this book had finally done it. )

    • Sirena Bergman (The Independent), How the use of the 150 year old speculum puts women off smear tests. What I found most interesting was the discussion of several innovations on the speculum (an inflatable one! One that opens in a different direction! One made of sex toy silicone!) that have simply not got off the ground. Bergman reports that doctors aren't interested / don't have time to train in using new tools, although I would be interested to know if there are other factors.


    Audio:
    • I have been enjoying Look At Me, a Guardian podcast hosted by Ben Law and Chris McCormack, in which Chris explains unsual animals to Ben, Ben interprets them through the Queer Agenda, and then they talk to researchers and citizen conservationists.


    Aesthetic or Amusing Things:
    highlyeccentric: close-up image of pansies (the flower) (pansies)
    Short essays, current affairs, hot takes:
    • Robert Booth (Guardian UK) England's national parks out of reach for poorer people due to public transport cuts.
    • Natasha Bertrand (The Atlantic), Russia is attacking the US court system from within - links up evidence from a recent Mueller filling against a troll farm.
    • Spanish company CAF rejects tender for building a light rail in Jerusalem as it cross the '67 border, and the company will not violate international law. (Ma'an News)
    • Follow up to the 'colonisation of the Americas caused the Little Ice Age' article: critique from environmental historian Dagomar Degroot on Twitter. (TL;DR, it's by no means clear that the Little Ice Age began post-1492, and the study derived its estimate of pre-columban American populations by averaging all previous estimates, including dodgy ones. Article also doesn't sufficiently explain why reforestation in the Americas should outweigh deforestation in Europe and Asia in the early modern period enough to create a carbon drain.)
    • If you would like to read a reflective piece about someone making an OBVIOUSLY TERRIBLE CHOICE and just barely realising by the end of it how daft they'd been, Archer Magazine has an article by someone who gave their mother a vibrator. (The mother did give her endorsement to the article at least)
    • Literary agent DongWon responds to the advice that 'the people' want plot over feelings:



    Longreads - essay, memoir, other
    • Isabel Ronai (The Conversation AU) New study confirms what scientists already know: basic research is under-valued. Innovative/ground-breaking/cancer-curing research is built on basic exploratory science, and the latter is drastically underfunded.
      We need a new investment approach from government funding agencies. The best strategy for high-risk ventures, such as basic research, is to provide stable funding to a wide variety of projects to diversify the risk. If we cast a wider net, we ensure we will always catch one of these “big fish”.
      Funders can think of themselves as angel investors who are investing in a portfolio of start-up businesses (another type of venture that is high risk but also high reward).
      The expectation of government funding agencies needs to be that most investments in basic research will not provide a return on investment.

    • Ian Parker (The New Yorker), A suspense novelist's trail of deceptions: exposé on the many weird shenanigans of Dan Mallory/AJ Finn, including faking his own mother's death, and the fact that an author he was commissioning editor for seems to have commissioned a detective to figure him out (but won't admit she did so, and seems to have used him as inspiration for her novels).
    • Corelli Barnett (BBC history), The Wasting of Britain's Marshall Plan aid. If you're paying attention to UK twitter lately you may have seen some ill-informed conservatives being soundly mocked for the claim that Britain 'mortgaged herself' to free Europe and received no post-war aid in return. This is untrue! What's even more fascinating is the story of how, exactly, it came to be that Britain claimed more Marshall Aid than any other European country, but spent so little of it on infrastructure.
      The dream of Britain as a global power also included the 'invisible empire' of the Sterling Area, to which Britain chose to play the banker. This was despite the fact that her reserves of gold and dollars were well known in Whitehall to be far too scanty for this role. By the end of 1947, the American dollar loan had already been largely spent, but the gulf still remained between the cost of Britain's self-inflicted global commitments and her inadequate earnings from exports. Without another huge dollar handout, Britain would have to give up all her global strategic commitments, as well as her role as the banker to the Sterling Area, and accept that she was now only a second-class power.

      all the illusions and follies of post-war British policy now reached their climax in the wasting of Britain's Marshall Aid )

      A few weeks back I linked to Pankaj Mishra's essay which describes Brexit as Partition come home to roost. There are references in this BBC essay to Britain's imperial policy - the delusion of the 'grand power' - but I would be particularly interested to read something that linked up this domestic economic failure with Partition / various other end-of-empire messes.
    • Electronic Frontiers Foundation, The mistake so bad even youtube says its copyright bot really blew it:
      YouTuber SmellyOctopus has over 21,000 subscribers to his YouTube channel, and about 2,000 on Twitch. In early January 2019, SmellyOctopus did a nine-minute, private stream where spoke into his microphone to check how new technology he was using affected it. It was automatically uploaded to YouTube, where the Content ID system flagged 30 seconds of just SmellyOctopus’ voice as belonging to a company called CD Baby.And the results are ridiculous )

      Content ID is even more automated than you might think. It doesn’t just check for copyrighted material in its database and send notices when it finds a match, leaving it up to the copyright holder to determine if they should make a claim. No, what happens is that, if a match is found, a default option chosen by the content company when it joined Content ID is automatically applied to a video before it’s uploaded.

    • Na'ama Carlin (Meanjin blog) Ill met by gaslight. I had a skewed reaction to this due to the phrasing of one particular thing, but it's overall a good article.
    • Joseph Cox (Motherboard), Big Telecom sold customer gps data typically used for 911 calls. I'm unclear how this e-911 data differs from regular gps data (does it?), but: YIKES.


    Notable DW content this week:
    • [personal profile] liv has a post 'Stomping the Brainweasels' on her fear of making 'boring' posts. [personal profile] melannen has a notable comment in praise of boring journals: 'Just, the reassurance that there are people living incredibly boring lives and still being interesting people and time keeps ticking over was sometimes 100% what I needed to read on the internet.'
      I have seen many other people, both here and on twitter, lamenting the demise of LJ-era daily life blogging. Like all nostalgia it's rose-tinted, but I think it is fair to say that Boring Journals Are Worthwhile.
    • I haven't read it in the depth it deserves, but [personal profile] silveradept has a long post on Trust, Fandom, and Federation, with useful example from recent ALA controversies.
      What [personal profile] sciatrix hits on, though, is that part of the ability to know whether someone is going to be a trustworthy and committed moderator is by watching them make decisions about moderation and administration and seeing whether their ethics and ways of handling the problem are in accord with you. And to take a poke around their space and see if it's the kind of space that's favorable to people that you would find terrible. If the only way you can see whether someone's going to be good or terrible is by rolling the die and signing up with them, they're not going to attract a whole lot of people. Having a Code of Conduct out front is helpful, of course, but sometimes it's in seeing what happens when someone actually is accused of a violation that is most informative to someone about whether a space is going to be a good fit for them.
      Time for an example that has basically nothing to do with fandom, but is absolutely illustrative of how this sort of thing happens.

    • Astolat has another update to the signalboost bookmarklet, that now not only includes a warning if you try to boost a locked post, but also preserves html from the original post (links, usernames, etc). Here.


    This got pretty long, so I'm holding over a bunch of stuff for Thursday morning.
    highlyeccentric: Teacup - text: while there's tea there's hope (while there's tea there's hope)
    Short essays, current affairs, hot takes:
    • You may have heard about the study reporting links between gum disease and Alzheimers. The NHS breakdown is worth a read. TL;DR version: study not unreliable per se, but the projections toward a vaccine are very speculative and note that they're coming from the study members who work for the lab that hopes to make the vaccine.
    • BBC report on the Pitt Rivers returning anthropological specimens. Not a revolution, more an acceptable minimum, but it's nice to know the Pitt Rivers are being half-decent.
    • Vox.com video on how marginal tax brackets work is useful if you're confused about tax policy and/or your personal finances, and sort of soothing even if you know how this works already. Examples are US brackets, but the system is similar in Aus and (afaik) anywhere else I've paid tax.
    • Jade Alburo, Twitter thread on archival bias, reporting an story told by Prof Long T. Bui about the Vietnam Center and Archive in Texas.

    • SBS news, Three month religious service stops as asylum family pardoned: bit more complex than the headline suggests (the family haven't had final confirmation they can stay), but Dutch law prevents authorities from interrupting a church service. So when an Armenian family sought refuge, the congregation conducted non-stop worship for three months, keeping the family safe. A Good Use of a religious privilege.
    • NY Times reports that one Brooklyn jail has been running on minimal to no heating during the polar vortext. Somehow I doubt this will be fixed by Monday.
    • Behrouz Boochani wins Australia's richest literary prize for 'No Friend But the Mountains'. His translator accepts the award for him, because, of course, Boochani remains unable to enter Australia.


    Longreads - essay, memoir, other
    • Ana Valens (Daily Dot), Mastodon is crumbling and many blame its founder. TL;DR, not the paradise for queer users that some Tumblr refugees described. Although I gather that Mastodon is not the same thing as the 'fediverse' at large and Federated Fandom might be gravitating to Hubzilla (?).
    • Gina Mei (Electric Lit), Learning to cook for one.
      Can loneliness be taught? Can it become a habit? Can it be unlearned? I’m not sure — but for me, it has always been a safety blanket.

      Unlike Anita Lo, however, I hate cooking for myself )
    • Jonathan Amos (BBC science), Colonisation of the Americas cooled the earth's climate (Colonisation kills, depopulation leads to reforestation for formerly agricultural lands, creates carbon sink)
    • Steve Down (The Saturday Paper AU) profiles Joel Bray, Wiradjuri dancer and choreographer.
      Dancer and choreographer Joel Bray nervously greets 20 of us at the door of his Sydney city hotel suite and ushers us inside. His underwear is strewn about the room and he asks us to put on a hotel-issue black dressing gown over our clothes and take a seat wherever we can find one. His lithe, nude body is sheathed in an identical robe.

      Bray meets our apprehension with studied anxiety, nervously pouring us drinks before crumpling at all angles on the floor, his face frozen in a rictus. He bounces up and dashes onto the bed in the adjoining room, holding up a Holy Bible as though it is a haloed digest of forbidden hunks, which, depending on your taste, it may well be.
      What the opening paras of the profile don't say is that this hotel encounter is in itself the theatre piece, not just what happens when you interview Joel Bray.
    • Kathryn Vandervalk (Electric Lit), Stop assuming that I'm just writing about myself, an essay that covers the problematic fact that marginalised authors (and the author notes that as a white woman she's hardly the most marginalised) find their work reduced by audiences to assumed autobiography. It goes on, though, to some comments on the really interesting character/author boundary: if you assume what happens to the character is what happened to the author, are you also assuming that what the character thinks is what the author thinks?
      Once, I read a piece in workshop where the protagonist with the same “sandy blonde hair and erudite glasses” as the author was also a Christ figure with an exceptionally large penis. That personal myopia is different from the myopia an author constructs when writing from the perspective of a single character )
      I don't really have a pithy comment here, but this is a problem I think about a lot in so many contexts.
    • Peggy O'Donnel (Jezebel) The settler fantasies woven into the prairies dress
    • Lily Cho (Hook and Eye) has an essay on crying at work that says all the usual things you'd expect about gender, emotion, and types of work. It's conlcuding paragraph says something about the way Cho experiences emotion itself, that struck me (although I'm not sure I understand it fully):
      “Unlike replicants,” Terada argues, “zombies don’t experience themselves as though they were someone else” (Terada 2001: 157). There is something noble about the zombie’s undivided desires, the clarity of it, that I would like to replicate but I know that I can’t maintain it. I can’t feel without division. The best I can do is to recognize that the expression of intense emotion — let’s call it crying in a meeting for now — is a deeply alienating moment where I am experiencing myself as though I were someone else. It is not fun to feel this way but it is a discomfort that I have to hang on to because I want to be alive to the difficulties and the deeply divided desires at the heart of all the good fights that I want to keep fighting.
    • Simon Caterson (Meanjin Blog) Present tense: W.B. Yeats' The Second Coming at 100

      While ‘The Second Coming’ arises out of the unique creative partnership between Yeats and Georgie, there is another aspect which makes it universal and timeless and which is not private and abstruse at all but universal and indeed may seem obvious once it is pointed out.

      Quite simply, what gives lyric poetry of the kind revived and mastered by Yeats so much of its power is the mere fact that it is written in the present tense.

      the poem is always happening, the prophecy endlessly experienced )
      I love that poem and I love my problematic weird uncle Yeats.
    • Hana Pera Aoake I'm not single or taken I'm at the gym. Has a real way with words, for talking about depression. May not be safe reading if you have weight/exercise/etc issues (or it may be therapeutic. Mileage may vary.)
    • Lucie Shelley (Electric lit) interviews Kirsten Roupenian about her short story collection (from which the viral hit Cat Person was drawn).
      KR: Universality is in the mind of the reader ) if I read and loved Stephen King when I was an eleven year old girl who’d never seen a monster, why shouldn’t some theoretical crotchety old man be able to enjoy a book about monstrous teenage girls?


    Items of humourous interest
    • Meet the four cats playing Captain Marvel's pet cat Goose.
    • Tessa Smith (tesselationsinnature blog) consults with zoologists Jack Ashby and Kotaro Tokana to rank toy wombats by scientific accuracy. Jack Ashby, he of 'it's like someone shaved a hedgehog and made it have babies with a seal' is really funny both about accurate and inaccurate wombats.
      Jack Ashby: The shape is great: the head sags glumly downwards, the back and bum are round, the legs are barely discernible from the body. I love it. They mixed the lighter ears of (some) common wombats with the lighter eye-rings of (some) hairy-nosed wombats, and the toe-count is wrong again, but its overall wombattiness is excellent.4.5


    Notable DW content this week:
    • Siderea, Rent and reputation, on why US landlords consult credit scores but your rental history doesn't contribute to your credit score. First few parts baffling but interesting if you're not from the US; the last of 5 parts gets into some of the interesting theory of surveillance.
      This is one of the regular issues with surveillance systems. It's potentially bad for you if someone amasses a dossier of data about you, sure. But it's potentially even worse if that dossier represents itself to be complete but is not.

      Then you wind up in situation like this one, where people discriminate against you in business dealings, due to absence of positive data - or simply absence of data.

      One of the problems with surveillance systems is that they can, as they become normalized, perversely drive people to "opt in" to those systems, to make sure the surveillance system has enough data, as well as the right data.

      This is one of those two-level attitude things, where you might hate the idea of this information about you being tracked and traded, but if it is going to be tracked and traded, you want to make sure its as favorable as possible.
      Unfortunately, this situation drives people to maximize their exposure to data collection.
    • [personal profile] redsnake05 has another post of fashion spreads interpreted. This time Annie Lennox's repressed doppelganger works in an office.
    • [personal profile] muccamukk has a post of Questions About Federation (the social media system, not Australian politics), including key questions such as:
      • What happens if whoever runs that instance flounces? Does the pictures go bye? If not, where does it go, and who pays for hosting?
      • How does the "We'll spread the server cost!" thing fit into this?
      • I post a picture of an eagle, where is that picture hosted, who is paying for it, and who has the ability to remove it?
      The comments have a lot of people echoing these questions, and some answers, of which I recommend [personal profile] impertinence's thread here.
    highlyeccentric: A green wing (wing)
    I went to a pretty good concert last night. It's kind of difficult to retain the appreciation of that in my mind, when... everything.

    This piece I read yesterday sticks with me:

    Of course the protesters know that no one will be returning anywhere at the end of this march. Of course they have no plans (or means) to remove the fence. And of course this protest isn’t an attempt to somehow remove or negate the state of Israel. Any suggestion that these are the aims or expectations is ridiculous. The protesters merely want their voices to be heard; they merely want the Nakba, and its decades of repercussions, to be included in the rest of the world’s narrative, rather than dismissed. It is only the hope of becoming a fully recognised state one day (with all its accompanying freedoms) that has kept Palestinians alive these last 70 years – alive through wars, blockades, endless indignities and uncertainties. Those 70 years have turned the Gaza Strip into a prison where everyone is serving a life sentence; and everyone’s children will serve a life sentence too; and their children’s children, and so on.

    The protest’s message is simple: We cannot live like this for ever; even after 100 years Palestinians will still be born with inalienable human rights, however much the Israelis want to stamp them into the dirt. Israel cannot expect to enjoy peace, stability or prosperity while we are still penned in like animals on a factory farm. The fence is not only a physical border between two nations. It is also a conceptual, discriminatory line between two worlds, two realities. The misery of one world is the happiness of the other; the dreams of the former are buried beneath seven decades of sand in the latter.


    Atef Abu Saif, for The Guardian
    highlyeccentric: (Beliefs and Ideas)
    I think this happened in 2002, maybe 2003. It was after Sept 11 2001, because the teacher in question didn't come to our school until 2002.

    Evangelical Christians believe they are under attack - spiritually, materially, socially. They are taught to see threats everywhere, and to rehearse responses to it. There was a version of the story of the Columbine massacre in which one of the students in the library was asked, before being shot, 'Do you believe in God?' and answered 'yes'. We were given exerpts of a biography and versions of the story to read, to internalise, to _fantasise about dying under fire_.

    (I now find a. that that version has been discredited and b. this was not a feature of the entire massacre)
    (and now I teach medieval studies and find myself faced with students who don't instinctively understand the point of marytrologies)

    At some point in 2002, or maybe 2003, a student - a personable, charming guy, I'd had a crush on him for most of junior high - asked our English teacher, for reasons I can't recall, 'If the muslims invaded and you had to either convert or die, would you be willing to die for Jesus?'

    And she said no.

    She said no, if she was at gunpoint she would convert. To Islam, or anything else. She said she would hold her faith in God in her heart and hope for change, but she knew she didn't have the courage to die.

    (There was no point in trying to point out the structural issues here - that since Sept 11 2001 the fantasies of dying at the hands of atheists or oppression by The World had taken on a specific, and racist, cast. To single THIS fantasy out as specifically weird would have encountered mostly blank faces, because they - we - had been being trained for years to envision life-or-death tests of faith. Life, death or premarital sex.)

    This was not well-received in this classroom, but it stuck with me. I instantly recognised myself: I, too, would convert.

    (I am pretty sure this teacher had universalist tendencies as strong as my own.)

    The same teacher taught senior religious studies, and let me do my special topic research on Islam.

    I don't have a conclusion here, except to say that: this was a completely normal conversation in my school. Fantasies of martyrdom at the hands of a religious group we had never even met. And that one teacher had the courage to puncture the bubble and say 'no. We don't all have to be martyrs'.

    She wasn't a perfect teacher by any means, but I respect her for that. She had the courage to speak an unwanted truth in the face of consequences far more immediate than martyrdom - the mockery of teenagers, the loss of social capital, damage to her standing in the eyes of staff and parents. We don't all have to be martyrs, and probably most of us wouldn't, and frankly it was fucking weird to train us to expect we would.




    ( Related, one of the things I am most ashamed of in my life is an occasion when I had taken a friend to an evangelical church service and, because she wanted to, I went through the process of 'dedicating my life to Jesus'

    Not because I didn't believe. I did. I was a very devout child. But because I did not have any sense that I /invited jesus into my heart/ that day - I firmly believed I was a christian and had always been. I went through the happy-clappy and the laying on of hands and I felt /dirty/. I did not have the courage to say 'no, this isn't for me, this is not my experience of faith, this is an insult to the baptism my parents gave me and the confirmation I expect to fulfil in my home congregation')
    highlyeccentric: Sign: Be aware of invisibility! (Be aware of invisibility)
    I am an incrementalist by nature but not in this case )

    I sent some $ to the yes campaign at the start of the month, but not as much as I could have - it seems like sinking money into a bog. It's unlikely that we'll win, and regardless of whether we do or not, between them the yes and no campaigns are fortifying a national discourse wherein the sexuality is legitimised by legal wedlock, and marital bonds elevated above other social bonds. And I just... maybe I'm too much of a coward to face calling my relatives, but I'd rather support the likes of Twenty10 and the GLCS - the networks that are going to be doing the hard caring work for the most vulnerable queers regardless of marriage outcomes.

    I have been sending little personalised postcards to first my MP and then working my way through a list of NSW senators urging them to either oppose a 'one man one woman OR two men OR two women' bill (in the case of opposition/green senators) or to advocate for a more inclusively worded bill (liberal/national senators).

    And I subscribed to Overland today, because they're the only publication whose marriage articles haven't been making me feel queasy. (Well, Archer have been okay but not as punchy as Overland, and I'm already subscribed to them.)

    TL;DR it's hard being a non-marrying queer in the time of plebiscite-surveys.

    WELL

    Jul. 14th, 2017 08:52 am
    highlyeccentric: Divide by cucumber error: reinstall universe and reboot (Divide by cucumber)
    I was just thinking yesterday that Auspol had been suspiciously normal, compared to the UK and the US, for at least a week.

    NEVER FEAR. Today I woke up to news of:

    A: SECRET KIWI IN THE SENATE

    and

    B: Turnbull's plans to override the laws of mathematics.

    I'm not sure what's best about item A: that Scott Ludlam has been an illegitimate senator all this time, or that he DIDN'T REALISE HE WAS A KIWI. He 'didn't realise citizenship followed you like that'. You're a SENATOR, sir.* How many immigration debates have you slept through?

    Item B is pure gold and the best motivation I have ever heard for subscribing to a VPN service. Declare your allegiance to the laws of mathematics!

    * Wait, no you're not. You've never actually been a Senator. You've just been... in the Senate. A secret Kiwi in the senate.
    highlyeccentric: I've been searching for a sexual identity, and now you've named it for me: I'm a what. (Sexual what)
    For those who haven't heard, one, Australia is apparently going to have a (non-binding!) plebiscite on the topic of equal marriage, and two, the Australian Christian Lobby are requesting that anti-discrimination/hate speech laws be lifted during the campaign. Because they can't argue against our right to marry without arguing against our right to exist, apparently, which really does just make the pro-equality argument for them.

    There is a very, very good article on this at the Conversation, by Patrick Stokes of Deakin University. It covers reasons why a plebiscite is a shitty idea, the underlying anxieties about heterosexual "specialness", and reasons why exemption from hate speech laws would be a terrible idea. (Stokes is not uncritical of the marriage equality lobby, either, which is good.)

    The impact of homosexual marriages on heterosexual married couples is that their marriages stop being special just because they are heterosexual. It takes away the privilege of being in the ‘right’ sort of marriage, a default, ‘normal,’ and implicitly normative form of relationship.


    I also have feelings on this topic. My feelings are different from my political opinions (political opinions, in short: marriage equality would not be as good a fix for the problems it purports to fix as would be a broad programme of legal changes to the way custody, inheritance, kinship and related laws work; but fucking hell if we're coming down to a yes or no vote then fine, I will gear up for this fight). I made this as a Facebook post, but putting it here so it's more easily findable. It's not going under a cut, because it's not meant to stay private.




    The fact we do seem to be going to a plebiscite makes me feel ill. I don't want this, I don't want this, I don't want this.

    Here's some things you probably know about me: once upon a time I was a very earnest Christian. And a very argumentative one. And, as religious people go, a relatively liberal one, albeit armed more with enthusiasm and a sense of justice than a good sense of political analysis, because I was a wee teenager. I was in the Uniting Church for the Resolution 84 kerfuffle of 2003, and just beginning to form a political awareness. The people I looked up to and admired, my peers and mentors from the UYF and our champion ministers Lyn and Nancy were broadly in favour of such notions as being nice to gay people, and permitting them to train in ministry. (Resolution 84 is a wiffle-waffle: it says you won't be explicitly banned, but does not promise that you will be explicitly included. There are reasons for this.) So I was too, and drew on those people and their resources for starting to inform myself.

    No, wait, back up. Some time before that- maybe 2002?- I was in a circle of people at school. Mostly students, one teacher. "Nondenominational" for which read fundamentalist Christian school - the kind where Catholics were bullied for being insufficiently Christian. The teacher was asking us all where we went to church, and to discuss our church communities. I said, without expecting any reaction, that I went to the Uniting Church.

    "The Uniting Church?" said the teacher. "They're not Christians. Don't they have gay ministers?"

    I had some idea what 'gay' meant at that point. (It was a dodgy idea: I'd been reading Anne McCaffrey, where being gay got you either eaten by tigers or late-life reformed heterosexuality with a girl half your age, but I digress.) I had no idea why I was getting this reaction. I considered, for a second or two, saying I didn't know. I considered everything I knew of my church, and of my school.

    "Yes, we do," I said. "And I'm proud of it." Then I went home and asked my mother to explain why people thought gay people couldn't be ministers????

    From there on, throughout high school and university, I set about being an informed gay-friendly Christian. I armed myself with historical analyses of St Paul's context and the difference between pederasty and an equal relationship between partners of any sex. I read "Uniting Faith and Sexuality" about six times. I argued with more conservative Christians wherever I found them. I actually met some gay people, and they were cool. (They were soooo cooool I envied them a lot. We'll come back to that.) I was also a prat, and made what I now realise were classic intro-level Ally Fails. Once I was talking to a baptist at a UCA student convention, and this baptist said he had never met a gay person before. I said "I can fix that" and hauled Curtis over to be Token Gay. (I'm *so sorry*, Curtis).

    And in my fourth year of university, many things changed. One of these was that suddenly there was a giiiiirl and she was pretty and, well, you get the idea. And this time (unlike previous times in high school or early uni days) I had the self-awareness and the vocab (I had never met the word bisexual until my first year of uni!) to realise that duh, I had crush on this GIRL. And that made many things make sense, including the fact that I had sat with the UCA queers feeling both happy (included!) and sad (different??) and envious (???).

    And I stopped going to church. Part of that was because I also had an anti-revelation and stopped believing in God. But I'd stopped going to church *before* that. Not because I thought my particular congregation would give me trouble over my sexuality - I'd seen other friends come out, it had been fine. And I knew the UCA was, overall, a pretty welcoming denomination. But not entirely. And there would always be others. And I knew how exhausting those conversations were, because I had been having them since I was fifteen. I had been told I was not a Christian and my church was invalid not because *I* was gay but because I was hypothetically theoretically gay-positive.

    I had absolutely no qualms, when I thought it wasn't about me, in throwing myself into that fight (in the particular context I was in).

    I could not do it, not when it *was* about me. And I have never, not since I started coming out to people, had to justify the existence of same-sex attraction in general, to anyone. (I have had to justify myself as a bisexual, to both gay and straight people; and to pitch in in defense of other gender or sexual identities.)

    I do not want to do this. I am a long way away from Australia right now, but I do not want to do this. I do not want to have to find out that many of my friends or family will not only vote against equal marriage (... I don't want to find that out, either) but will turn out to hold degrading, dehumanising opinions of me and my peers. I don't want my friends and peers to turn on the TV to find ads denouncing our evil influence on society. I don't want to have to have conversations with friends and family about how I do not wish to marry but I will be really, really fucking upset if I think any of them could deliberately vote against my *right* to do so.

    I don't want to do this. Stop the ride, I want to get off.
    highlyeccentric: Julia Gillard making a Lleyton Hewitt salute (Gillard)
    Draco grabbed Pansy's arm and pulled her behind the nearest tapestry. 'We've reached peak flag,' he said. 'It's on!'

    It was the matter of moments to explain the situation to Crabbe. Most of them belonged to Malfoy: 'I feel our styles are divergent: you're all classic Death Eater, I'm more complex anti-hero with a possibility of later redemption. It's just not working for me. Also, I've been planning your public downfall since you rolled me four years ago and I can't think of a better time than four days before you meet the criteria for your Prime Ministerial pension supplement.'

    Pansy's message was simpler: 'You're dumped, Crabbe. And you're taking Goyle with you.'

    Even Rita Skeeter couldn't argue, epsecially when Malfoy fronted the media with his hair glinting perfectly in the afternoon sun and with no phalanx of flags to make his argument for him, but rather words, more than three, constructing an actual argument. Draco looked earnestly into the camera. 'We need advocacy,' he said. 'Not slogans. We need a different style of leadership, one that respects the people's intelligence."

    Two hours later, Crabbe replied. 'We're not the Labor Party!' he declared. 'We are not the Labor Party! WE ARE NOT THE LABOR PARTY!

    'Alas,' muttered the Australian Voting Public, remembering well that – mad as they may have been, and in all honesty they put cut snakes to shame – the Labor Party under both Harry and Hermione had provided stable government, passing legislation, negotiating intelligently with the opposition and cross benches and rarely embarrassing us on the international stage.

    For hours they pretended there was still a decision to be made. Goyle announced: 'We cannot and we must not become a carbon copy of the Australian Labor Party.'

    But it was all to no avail. Of the 99 votes, Draco received 54, Vince 44, and Kevin Andrews drew a picture of a penis.

    Crabbe was out, having served less time than any Australian Prime Minister since the one who was eaten by a shark*.

    *Probably


    The full saga of Vincent Crabbe and the Goblet of Bile can be found at blamebrampton's LJ.
    highlyeccentric: Sign on Little Queen St - One Way both directions (Default)
    Port Arthur was the tipping point for Australia, after many years of avoidance by politicians who knew the gun laws needed reform but lacked the guts to do it. The murder of 35 people on one afternoon marked the end of the prevarication. The laws were overhauled with resounding success: annual gun deaths have dropped by half, and we have not had a mass shooting since 1996. An evaluation by researchers at the Australian National University found the laws saved, every year, 200 lives and $500 million.
    Other developed countries that have suffered such calamities have also toughened their gun laws. The massacre at the Sandy Hook Elementary School reprises the tragedy at Dunblane Primary School in Scotland in 1996, where 16 children and their teacher were murdered and 12 more children wounded by a disgruntled man with a gun. The only eventual glimmer of consolation for those grieving families was that Britain reformed its gun laws, and it is extremely unlikely that such a horror will recur in that country.
    Commentators in the US are shocked and horrified, of course, but they have come to see mass shootings as an inevitable feature of the American way of life. ''We know it's going to happen again and again," they say, but the experience of Australia shows it doesn't have to be that way.


    Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/politics/will-the-sandy-hook-massacre-be-americas-tipping-point-20121216-2bhfy.html#ixzz2FG9jjArL


    I'm absolutely sickened by the number of people trying to assert that now, in the wake of a mass shooting, is *not* the time to talk about gun law reform in the US. Yes, it is possible that people (particularly privileged white male people) might still get hold of guns illegally. It's LESS LIKELY. There is *concrete evidence* that gun ownership restrictions reduce the number of mass shootings. Which, hey, saves money! The US could do with saving $500 million dollars, surely.

    As someone was pointing out on tumblr - immediately after 9/11, airport security was rapidly tightened. Why is it not the same with gun laws?
    highlyeccentric: Arthur (BBC Merlin) - text: "SRSLY" (SRSLY)
    Congratulations. I'm pleased and proud and relieved at your exercise of democratic common sense. And this election gives me hope, in a way that the '08 election does not, that your country stands a good chance of improving itself, improving the lives of its citizens, and also not dragging the rest of the world into either economic or political disasters. Good on you. Take ten points.

    It is one thing to elect a liberal(ish) candidate who promises you, as Obama did in 08, all the pies you could possibly fit into the sky. Economic recovery! Free health care! Milestone black dude in the presidency! Restoration of your much-vaunted and much-abused position as Leaders of the Free World!

    It is entirely a different matter to re-elect the same man when four years has proven that you can't fix everything with one milestone vote. Maybe it's just that I was ill-informed about the ins and outs of American governance four years ago (guilty as charged!), but I get the feeling that the past four years, and the hard fight the Obama government has had to put up just to make the tiniest of gains on the sort of things which much of the rest of the world takes for granted (vis: universal healthcare) - I get the feeling that President Yes We Can's struggle to yes anything has shown up the huge swathes of problems yet to be fixed.

    And yet the voting population turned out and cast its lot in with the forces of change again. Mostly. The Republican House is not good news, not from where I'm sitting, in a country where most of your *Democrats* would be considered centre-right and the republicans could line up from right wing to 'completely barking mad'. But apparently yours is a country which deeply mistrusts things like, I dunno, making sure its citizens have adequate health care - and in that case, we can hope that anything which gets through a hostile house, while imperfect, may be longer-lasting and perhaps provide precedent for future change.

    Also you got a gay lady, a pansexual lady and a disabled lady into your Senate! And several states put through gay marriage by popular vote! Those I am not relieved about, but quite pleased! These are precedents the rest of us can hope to emulate (although, gay lady senator? CHECK. We got one of those. She's even got a BAAAAABY. D'awww). The marijuana thing I've no actual opinion on but I'm amused by the question of how, precisely, anyone's going to deal with having a drug that's legal by state ballot but federally illegal.

    I still find the amount of money, private or otherwise, you lot spend on election campaigns to be really quite worrying. But congratulations. I was cynical and grumpy four years ago and pissed a number of you off, but this time: congratulations on your exercise of democratic common sense.

    Now, for the love of all that's sensible, do something about this 'fiscal cliff' thing I keep hearing about, mkay?
    highlyeccentric: Inception - Arthur in his badass waistcoat (Inception - badass waistcoat)
    To express my love of compulsory voting.

    You citizen? YOU VOTE. Or we fine you a small amount of money. You can hand your form in blank or draw butts all over it if you like, but you hand the damn form in.

    Positive consequences of this system:

    - voting on Saturdays, when more people are free to do so
    - everyone recognises the government and general public responsibility to ensure that everyone has access to voting systems. We're not perfect at implementing that (see also: ratio of wheelchair-accessible to other polling places; low registration rates of rural indigenous people) but, y'know, if you're going to fine people for not voting you assume its your job to make it possible for them to do so
    - on a similar note, more efficient absentee voting systems
    - comparatively less time and money spent convincing people to vote at all (we spend some time and money educating people on how to register, where and when to vote, but we don't have to whip up voter enthusiasm JUST TO GET PEOPLE TO THE POLLS). People trudge down there, ignore the spruikers, and write something on a form. Lo, democracy!
    - 'voter fraud' isn't really a thing. Insofar as it might happen, it consists of people voting in multiple places: it's not possible to whip up fear of people voting who shouldn't vote, because EVERYONE DAMN WELL VOTES

    TL;DR, compulsory voting, I like it. I would endorse it for more institutions (eg: student unions! I never vote in union elections, even though I should. If my ACCESS card were to be disabled if I didn't vote, I'd damn well vote. I might even form an opinion).
    highlyeccentric: French vintage postcard - a woman in feminised army uniform of the period (General de l'avenir)
    I'm fed up to the ears with the US election, but it does generate some true things. Even at the HuffPo.

    You say it can't happen -- the system is too rotten.

    It won't happen if you wallow in the comfort of your cynicism. But it will happen if you and others like you get fired up.

    We've done it before.

    I remember when progressives joined with African-Americans to get enacted the Civil Rights and Voting Rights Acts. I remember when progressives stopped the Vietnam War. When women finally got freedom of choice over their own bodies. When the Environmental Protection Act became law.


    Relatedly, I am getting extremely sick with older people* telling me how shit the world is these days, how dismal the political prospects, how un-fixable the situation, how inappropriate the methods favoured by the Yoof of Today, and how everything was better and/or more effective in Their Day and by Their Favoured Methods.

    ~

    * Currently, people over about 30

    Profile

    highlyeccentric: Sign on Little Queen St - One Way both directions (Default)
    highlyeccentric

    April 2025

    S M T W T F S
       12345
    6789101112
    13141516171819
    20212223242526
    27282930   

    Syndicate

    RSS Atom

    Most Popular Tags

    Style Credit

    Expand Cut Tags

    No cut tags
    Page generated May. 17th, 2025 11:33 pm
    Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
    OSZAR »