It's been so long since I did a reading post that I it feels really weird to try to preface this with commentary on the best or most arresting thing I've read lately.
Here's something that stood out to me, though: Siderea on The Problem of Morality. I had another one of those weird conversations with my parents the other day where I offhandedly said something, of an acquaintance with a strained parent relationship, "well, if I had a father who [x], I'm not sure I'd WANT to speak to him". Parents: "you can't just stop talking to people over political differences!"
And I'm astounded, repeatedly, because... this seems like an abdication of morality, or ethics, to me. And yet, as my parents occasionally get up the gumption to needle me about, I obviously don't think people should exclude *me* because I offend their morals. I feel like there's a difference between making that since on the basis of *private morality* (how I conduct my sex or relationship life - and even then, as in the case of spousal abuse, there ARE reasons to stop talking to people over their private morality!), and over... political morality? Ethics? Something?
Siderea doesn't get into that particular distinction, but DOES contend that the "left", broadly defined, abdicated the field of morality-as-politics in the 80s, and is now hampered by that loss. And makes this very useful (for talking with older generations, at least) distinction:
The "pragmatics" approach to voting took longer to become untenable in Aus, and now we also have the problem where BOTH major parties hold some morally abhorrent policies because it's a race to the bottom.* And with the relatively lower profile of, eg, extra-judicial police homicide (it happens, it happens primarily to Indigenous people, followed by Middle Eastern and African Australians, but it's less frequent on a sheer numbers level, shifted toward less visible modes - deaths in custody - and simply getting less traction because, on a percentage level, Australia is whiter and more complacent), and the _not quite as bad_ wealth gap, means that it's possible to still be complacent middle class (perhaps especially if, like my parents, you achieved that status over your working life: things went right and are still going right for you) and think of political choices as matters of pragmatics and priorities.
*For that matter, I'm not convinced by Siderea's presentation of the 'extrajudicial murder of innocent citizens by the police: okay or no' as something that one US party firmly opposes and one supports. Are US democratic politicians actually putting forth platforms to end qualified immunity, or is it "fund the police more to take more anti-bias training, and ho and hum?"
Meanwhile, I got back into work with a six-hour binge in Eighteenth Century Collections Online. I give you: one of the odder things I found, a long poem entitled "Bibliotheca, a Poem Occasioned by the Sight of A Modern Library. With Some Very Useful Episodes and Digressions", by Thomas Newcomb:

The text is online here. It isn't very good.
Currently Reading:
Fiction for Fun: Greenwald's 'Cleanness', but very much on hiatus.
Non-fiction for personal interest: 'The Body Keeps the Score', also hiatus.
Lit Mag: Nothing right now
Poetry: Ditto. I did very much enjoy the poem My Queer by Emma Rhodes, in Plenitude Magazine, not least because I, too, named a doll after a very beautiful little girl of my acquaintance.
For work: Not nearly enough, but for mixed work-personal reasons I started Jen Manions "Female Husbands: A Trans History". I'm really enjoying it, although Manion's use of "to trans gender" as a verb grates, and I really don't think it was contexualised early enough, or given a strong enough justification when it was addressed.
Recently Finished: For certain values of 'recent'.
The Bloody Chamber and Other Stories by Angela Carter
My rating: 4 of 5 stars
I liked this a lot, but I didn't find it as utterly arresting as I had expected - I think because, ultimately, I've been reading in a post-Carter world since my teens.
I was surprised, and delighted, by the DuMaurier-esque feel of the title story. My favourites were probably the weirder ones toward the end - The Erl-King, and the triple sequence of Red Riding Hood-and-or-werewolf tales that come last, of which, the weird sexy 'The Company of Wolves' would be my favourite.
Anne quitte son île by L.M. Montgomery
My rating: 4 of 5 stars
Read this in the RadioCanada Oh!Dio audiolivre version. Loved it, as usual - although LMM sure does over-sell the ease of convincing two tomcats to cohabitate with one another!
Indecent Exposure: Gender, Politics, and Obscene Comedy in Middle English Literature by Nicole Nolan Sidhu
My rating: 4 of 5 stars
Really interesting, and I'm having a productive and challenging time wrestling with the wide difference between her take on the Reeve's Tale and that of other feminist scholars.
Comedy and the Politics of Representation: Mocking the Weak by Helen Davies
My rating: 4 of 5 stars
This wasn't actually what I was after, research-wise, but had some cool stuff in it anyway, especially an essay by Kate Fox, in the form of a dialogue, on the topic of autistic stand-up comedy.
Anne au Domaine des peupliers by L.M. Montgomery
My rating: 3 of 5 stars
Another really enjoyable audiolivre from Radio Canada. And as usual when re-reading this one as an adult, I'm really uncomfortable with the number of abusive parents who feature in the "humourous" community plots. It's also notable that the abusive mother is agreed to be not a NICE person, whereas Anne ends up concluding that both the abusive fathers are decent chaps after all. :s
Online Fiction:
Megan Arkenberg, In the City of Kites and Crows reprint/podcast at Glittership
Megan Arkenberg, All the King's Monsters, Clarkesworld, with audio.
Megan Arkenberg, Lessons from a clockwork queen, reprint/podcast at Glittership
Sarah Gailey, Tiger Lawyer gets it right, EscapePod
Aimee Ogden, In September, Podcastle
E.P. Tuazon, Barong, The Rumpus. I did not fully understand this but I liked it!
Bryan Washington, Foster, The New Yorker. A good cat story.
Erin Kate Ryan, The Girl Was Already On Fire, VQR.
Kavita Bedford, The Daintree.
Up Next: You know what this section gives me anxiety, let's cut it out entirely. No more 'up next' bits. Henceforth this section shall be...
Recently added to the endless TBR: Tempted to break my nigh-moratorium on both modern-setting romance novels and m/f romance novels for For the Love of April French by Penny Aimes; delighted to find a nerdy travelogue by someone who isn't a white man, namely, Monisha Rajesh's Around the World in 80 Trains.
Some links!
Susan Misicka, SwissInfo, I hear if it's not running: a profile of Martin Horath, who's worked on the Mt Rigi cogwheel railway for 25 years.
Justin Myers, British GQ, The Friend Zone has more meaning than you think.
Sarah Scire, Nieman Lab, Someone wrong on the internet? Correcting them publicly may make them act like a bigger jerk.
Carissa Harris, Aeon Mag, 800 years of rape culture. Smart public writing from feminist medieval studies.
Emillie Colyer, Meanjin blog, What I'm reading. I liked that she talked about the fragmentary nature of writing as an academic: "Because I’m doing a PhD, I am reading a lot of different things all at once, greedy for the thoughts of others".
Jonathan Parks-Rammage, Electric Lit, 7 queer books with heart-stopping twists
Dianna Anderson, Rewire News, Purity Culture as Rape Culture. Been following Diana for a while now, and finding their takes on evangelical culture very insightful.
Hilary Brenhouse, interview with Elissa Washuta, Guernica, Elissa Washuta: living inside this empire is all that I will ever have
That's by no means everything, but I have a kitten to exorcise. Happy Sunday, folks.
Here's something that stood out to me, though: Siderea on The Problem of Morality. I had another one of those weird conversations with my parents the other day where I offhandedly said something, of an acquaintance with a strained parent relationship, "well, if I had a father who [x], I'm not sure I'd WANT to speak to him". Parents: "you can't just stop talking to people over political differences!"
And I'm astounded, repeatedly, because... this seems like an abdication of morality, or ethics, to me. And yet, as my parents occasionally get up the gumption to needle me about, I obviously don't think people should exclude *me* because I offend their morals. I feel like there's a difference between making that since on the basis of *private morality* (how I conduct my sex or relationship life - and even then, as in the case of spousal abuse, there ARE reasons to stop talking to people over their private morality!), and over... political morality? Ethics? Something?
Siderea doesn't get into that particular distinction, but DOES contend that the "left", broadly defined, abdicated the field of morality-as-politics in the 80s, and is now hampered by that loss. And makes this very useful (for talking with older generations, at least) distinction:
And a good bit of that, I seem to recall, was back then it was less universal that the attraction of either party was moral positions. There were lots of people in both parties who were motivated by a purely pragmatic sense of public policy, and voted for the party or even the candidate whose policies they thought would be most effective for bringing about changes they thought were personally advantageous. For instance, one might believe a laissez-faire approach to markets was the best thing for the economic well-being of the American middle class and so vote for Republicans who advocated a hands-off policy towards the economy; or one might believe that government intervention was better for the economic well-being of the American middle class and so vote for Democrats who argued for that. Back when I was a frosh in college, that was actually a really common way young people aligned themselves politically!
As best I can tell that's completely untenable now. It doesn't matter what you think about monetary policy, your choices are the party which believes that extrajudicial killing of peaceable innocent citizens by the police is murder and the party that does not. And, as I explained above, morality overrules other considerations, like which approach to market regulation is most efficacious for prosperity.
The nature of the conflict we are now in is moral. And we need the conceptual tools of morality to even see it clearly, much less have any leverage on it.
The "pragmatics" approach to voting took longer to become untenable in Aus, and now we also have the problem where BOTH major parties hold some morally abhorrent policies because it's a race to the bottom.* And with the relatively lower profile of, eg, extra-judicial police homicide (it happens, it happens primarily to Indigenous people, followed by Middle Eastern and African Australians, but it's less frequent on a sheer numbers level, shifted toward less visible modes - deaths in custody - and simply getting less traction because, on a percentage level, Australia is whiter and more complacent), and the _not quite as bad_ wealth gap, means that it's possible to still be complacent middle class (perhaps especially if, like my parents, you achieved that status over your working life: things went right and are still going right for you) and think of political choices as matters of pragmatics and priorities.
*For that matter, I'm not convinced by Siderea's presentation of the 'extrajudicial murder of innocent citizens by the police: okay or no' as something that one US party firmly opposes and one supports. Are US democratic politicians actually putting forth platforms to end qualified immunity, or is it "fund the police more to take more anti-bias training, and ho and hum?"
Meanwhile, I got back into work with a six-hour binge in Eighteenth Century Collections Online. I give you: one of the odder things I found, a long poem entitled "Bibliotheca, a Poem Occasioned by the Sight of A Modern Library. With Some Very Useful Episodes and Digressions", by Thomas Newcomb:
The text is online here. It isn't very good.
Currently Reading:
Fiction for Fun: Greenwald's 'Cleanness', but very much on hiatus.
Non-fiction for personal interest: 'The Body Keeps the Score', also hiatus.
Lit Mag: Nothing right now
Poetry: Ditto. I did very much enjoy the poem My Queer by Emma Rhodes, in Plenitude Magazine, not least because I, too, named a doll after a very beautiful little girl of my acquaintance.
For work: Not nearly enough, but for mixed work-personal reasons I started Jen Manions "Female Husbands: A Trans History". I'm really enjoying it, although Manion's use of "to trans gender" as a verb grates, and I really don't think it was contexualised early enough, or given a strong enough justification when it was addressed.
Recently Finished: For certain values of 'recent'.

My rating: 4 of 5 stars
I liked this a lot, but I didn't find it as utterly arresting as I had expected - I think because, ultimately, I've been reading in a post-Carter world since my teens.
I was surprised, and delighted, by the DuMaurier-esque feel of the title story. My favourites were probably the weirder ones toward the end - The Erl-King, and the triple sequence of Red Riding Hood-and-or-werewolf tales that come last, of which, the weird sexy 'The Company of Wolves' would be my favourite.

My rating: 4 of 5 stars
Read this in the RadioCanada Oh!Dio audiolivre version. Loved it, as usual - although LMM sure does over-sell the ease of convincing two tomcats to cohabitate with one another!

My rating: 4 of 5 stars
Really interesting, and I'm having a productive and challenging time wrestling with the wide difference between her take on the Reeve's Tale and that of other feminist scholars.

My rating: 4 of 5 stars
This wasn't actually what I was after, research-wise, but had some cool stuff in it anyway, especially an essay by Kate Fox, in the form of a dialogue, on the topic of autistic stand-up comedy.

My rating: 3 of 5 stars
Another really enjoyable audiolivre from Radio Canada. And as usual when re-reading this one as an adult, I'm really uncomfortable with the number of abusive parents who feature in the "humourous" community plots. It's also notable that the abusive mother is agreed to be not a NICE person, whereas Anne ends up concluding that both the abusive fathers are decent chaps after all. :s
Online Fiction:
Recently added to the endless TBR: Tempted to break my nigh-moratorium on both modern-setting romance novels and m/f romance novels for For the Love of April French by Penny Aimes; delighted to find a nerdy travelogue by someone who isn't a white man, namely, Monisha Rajesh's Around the World in 80 Trains.
Some links!
That's by no means everything, but I have a kitten to exorcise. Happy Sunday, folks.